Delegation is always of authority, never of responsibility. When a manager delegates authority he remains responsible for the results achieved by his subordinate. If things go wrong he can never shift the blame to his subordinates, for he should have made sure before delegating authority that the result of this delegation would be the achievement of the objective he wished to achieve. Many managers find this principle difficult to accept and are therefore inclined to blame subordinates for failure. While, however, they can call their subordinates to account to them for their failure, they can never justify failure to their own superiors by blaming subordinates. They remain responsible for what is done by people under their control. The term 'delegation of responsibility' is sometimes used, but it is arguable that those who use it are. even if subconsciously, attempting to evade the fact that they are inevitably responsible for all that is done under their authority. leia todo o artigo
Friday, February 7, 2014
How To Direct And Manage A Company - A study by Artur Victoria
The authority of the directors is a corporate authority, that is to say it can be exercised only through a resolution of the board. The office of director carries with it no personal authority to give instructions or make decisions on behalf of the company. Frequently, however, managers employed by the company are invited to become directors. It is easy to see why this happens. If the board is discussing production matters it is helpful to have the works manager present, and if it is discussing sales policy it will wish the sales manager to contribute. It is a short step from inviting these executives to particular meetings to inviting them to be regular members of the board. Indeed, since policy in different fields interlock (there is an obvious interlock among research, design, production, sales, and finance) there is an advantage in having the principal heads of department on the board. leia todo o artigo